International Arbitration: How Cross-Border Disputes Are Resolved Without Courts

When two parties from different countries can’t agree—whether it’s a mining company in Nigeria and a French investor, or a South African construction firm and a Qatari contractor—they don’t always go to court. Instead, they turn to international arbitration, a private, binding process where neutral experts decide disputes outside national courts. Also known as cross-border dispute resolution, it’s become the go-to method for handling contracts, investments, and trade clashes across Africa and beyond. Unlike lawsuits, which drag on for years in local courts that might be slow or biased, arbitration is faster, confidential, and enforceable in over 170 countries thanks to the New York Convention. This makes it especially useful for African nations and foreign investors who need a fair, predictable way to settle big money fights without risking political fallout.

It’s not just about companies. Governments in Africa use international arbitration, a private, binding process where neutral experts decide disputes outside national courts when foreign firms claim they were treated unfairly—like when a state cancels a contract or nationalizes assets. In Nigeria, for example, disputes over oil deals and state administrator decisions often lead to arbitration, as seen in recent cases involving Rivers State officials. Meanwhile, in South Africa, business figures like Brown Mogotsi, who survived a targeted attack, may later turn to arbitration if their financial losses stem from broken agreements or political interference. Arbitration doesn’t just handle money—it handles power. When a government in Madagascar or a private investor in Angola hits a wall, arbitration gives them a neutral table to sit at, even when trust is gone.

What makes this system work? Three things: choice, expertise, and enforcement. Parties pick their own arbitrators—often retired judges, lawyers, or industry specialists who understand African markets. They pick the rules, the language, even the location. And if one side refuses to pay after a ruling? The award can be enforced in courts worldwide. That’s why more African businesses are adding arbitration clauses to contracts, even for deals that seem small. It’s not about distrust—it’s about protection. You’ll find examples of this in the posts below: legal battles over state power, corporate contracts gone wrong, and foreign investments under threat. These aren’t just news stories. They’re real-world cases where international arbitration is quietly shaping who wins, who loses, and how justice gets done when borders get in the way.

Hong Kong and Singapore Battle for Global Arbitration Dominance in 2025

Hong Kong and Singapore Battle for Global Arbitration Dominance in 2025

by Jason Darries, 18 Nov 2025, Business

In 2025, Hong Kong and Singapore remain the top two global arbitration seats, with HKIAC's unique access to mainland Chinese courts and Singapore's consistent efficiency giving each a distinct edge in international disputes.

Read More